When the Qur’an Taught the World to Think: Islamic Reason and the Making of Modern Civilization

Editorial Note

Some essays do not simply argue; they remember. This five-part study belongs to that rarer category of scholarship that excavates what history has learned to forget. Moving carefully between Qur’anic epistemology and civilizational history, the essay asks an unsettling question: what happens when a civilization loses memory of its own intellectual courage?

Rather than staging a defense of Islam or an indictment of the West, the author traces a quieter, more disturbing story—the slow migration of reason, science, and exploration from a Qur’an-animated world into Europe, followed by their renaming, rebranding, and eventual disconnection from their Islamic origins. Andalusia, Toledo, Sicily, and Venice emerge not as footnotes, but as living arteries through which modern civilization learned to breathe.

Future Islam publishes this work in the spirit of recovery, not nostalgia. It is an invitation to Muslims to re-encounter their intellectual past without romance, and to the wider academic community to acknowledge civilization as a shared, fragile inheritance. The journal hopes this essay will unsettle easy certainties, reopen difficult conversations, and remind us that the future of Islam may depend less on innovation than on the courage to remember.

Abstract

This article traces the epistemic foundations of modern civilization to the Qur’anic worldview and the intellectual traditions of Islamic societies between the seventh and sixteenth centuries. It argues that the Qur’an cultivated a culture of observation, reason, and exploration that shaped advances in science, medicine, architecture, and philosophy, particularly through centers such as Andalusia, Toledo, Sicily, and Venice. By examining the transmission of Islamic knowledge to Europe and the later erasure of these contributions from Western historiography, the study challenges the myth of an exclusively Western Renaissance. It concludes by calling for a recovery of Qur’anic reason as a shared civilizational inheritance rather than a forgotten or foreign past.

Part I
Qur’anic Epistemology and the Civilizational Compass of Islam

The Quran goes beyond the era of Prophet Muhammad; it serves as a comprehensive guide for the ages, tasked with leading humanity through the uncertainties of the post-prophetic times into the indefinite future. This scripture deeply emphasizes the need for continuous reflection, critical thinking, and the relentless pursuit of exploration—features not as pronounced in prior scriptures (Gutas 1998; Saliba 2007). Despite the entanglements of political conflicts, sectarian divisions, and complex theological debates, the Muslim intellect from the 7th to the 16th century primarily embraced reason and empirical observation over myths and superstitions (Huff 2003). Yet, a pivotal event in the latter half of the 16th century marked a definitive end to this era of enlightenment, ushering in a prolonged period of intellectual stagnation.
In 1580, the grand observatory in Istanbul—the largest of its kind, endorsed by the scholarly elite and the public alike—was deliberately torn down. There was this pervasive belief that probing too curiously into the heavens was an overstep, a divine provocation that had ushered in a plague as a celestial smackdown, necessitating the obliteration of the observatory’s very foundations (Saliba 2007). This event underscored a turning point where the Islamic world began to retreat from the vanguard of scientific exploration, just as the West was gearing up to redefine it. Across the horizon, Tycho Brahe and his contemporaries were erecting the scaffolds of modern astronomy. By 1600, under Tycho’s leadership, the West celebrated the birth of its first formal observatory. This era also celebrated Galileo, whose telescopic observations were dialing up the pressure on both the old and the new worldviews, catapulting the Copernican system—significantly indebted to Ibn al-Shatir—into the limelight as a contentious and vibrant debate (Kennedy 1983; Ragep 1993).

The burgeoning gap between Christian dogmas and the revelations of human inquiry spiraled into further explorations. By 1675, inspired by King Charles II, Greenwich was set to host a new observatory that would eventually anchor the Age of Discovery and position the Greenwich Meridian as the heartbeat of global time (Bennett 1987). From the dismantling of Taqi al-Din’s observatory in Istanbul to the rise of Greenwich’s iconic structure, this period was a dramatic shift in the narrative of civilization: a definitive migration of the exploratory spirit from the Islamic world to the West, irrevocably altering the dynamics of power and perspective between Islam and the West for centuries to come.

In the turbulent sixteenth century, the world stage was dominated by three towering empires: the Ottomans in Turkey, the Safavids in Iran, and the Mughals in India. These powers, despite their internal discord and vast differences, collectively epitomized the grandeur and authority of Islam in an era that had just witnessed the fall of Granada in 1492 and the adventurous sails of Columbus and Vasco da Gama (Subrahmanyam 1997). Yet, these events, which would later be trumpeted by Western historians as monumental, were just echoes in the corridors of time. By 1453, the Ottomans had delivered a seismic blow to Christendom by seizing Constantinople, plunging the Christian world into one of its gravest crises as the jewel of Eastern Christianity fell into Muslim hands (Runciman 1965).

By the time the Ottomans marched up to the gates of Vienna in 1683, their influence was not only solidified but seemed divinely ordained. The Christian narrative framed the Turks as God’s scourge, sent to punish them for their sins—a punitive force cloaked in divine wrath.

This era saw the likes of Martin Luther, who articulated an awe-struck respect for the Turks, suggesting that even the most devout Christian, if immersed in Turkish society for merely three days, would find it agonizing to cling to his faith (Luther 1529/1967). Luther was enamored with the Turkish way of life—their regal bearing, their cuisine, their fashion, and their communal worship far outshone the comparatively drab existence back in the West. The Turks, with their lavish display and spiritual fervor, not only commanded respect but also challenged the very foundations of Western religious conviction.

While Europe trembled at the might of Muslim cavalry charges, it was the oppressive clutch of the Church that really strangled them. Desperate for a breath of freedom, several governments found solace under the sweeping, protective shadow of Islam’s influence. Queen Elizabeth I of England, rebelling against the Pope’s decrees, strategically aligned with the Turks, courting them with diplomatic overtures that branded her almost a comrade to the Muslim cause in the eyes of the scandalized Catholic sphere (Matar 1999). The cultural splendor of the Ottoman Empire was so arresting that Sir Thomas Shirley, the English ambassador, famously noted how European youths who wandered into Turkish realms emerged transformed, their edges smoothed, practically re-cast as Muslims (MacLean 2004).

By 1606, this seductive power crystallized when British consul Benjamin Bishop, stationed in Egypt, converted to Islam, his return to Britain unthinkable, his old identity shed like a snake’s skin (Matar 1999). This era, though marked by the explorative leaps of Columbus and Vasco da Gama, which Europe celebrated as groundbreaking, registered barely a shrug in the Muslim world. What was there to marvel at? The Eastern naval fleets were behemoths of the sea, with meticulously organized armadas that dwarfed the modest tonnage of the mightiest Spanish or Portuguese ships (Needham 1971). The largest of these European ships could carry at most 100 tons, laughable when cast against the colossal Chinese junks that could shoulder up to 3100 tons.

In this grand scale, the Western forays into uncharted waters seemed more quaint than formidable, mere child’s play on the vast chessboard where Muslims reigned supreme. The Muslim world, comfortably ensconced in their maritime dominance, watched with detached amusement as the West paddled nervously into the vast, unknown beyond.

At this juncture in history, Muslims held the compass of civilization. Both Eastern and Western thinkers recognized that the vibrant resurgence energizing the West traced its veins back to the East. All the flourishing arts and scientific endeavors that Europe celebrated were deeply indebted to Muslim scholars (Huff 2003; Saliba 2007). These intellectuals first sparked the flames of a new scientific era in places like Sicily and Andalusia, where they nurtured the very minds that would later illuminate Europe with fresh scientific paradigms and a novel cultural ethos. Even until the 18th century, Avicenna’s The Canon of Medicine remained a cornerstone text in European academic circles (Siraisi 1990).

Part II
Church, Dogma, and the Manufacturing of Europe’s Dark Ages

Against this backdrop of intellectual effervescence, the demolition of Taqi al-Din’s observatory in Istanbul in 1580 might not have seemed a pivotal event. Yet, around the same time, Tycho Brahe in Denmark was laying down the groundwork for astronomical studies which led to the establishment of a major observatory by 1600 (Saliba 2007; Bennett 1987). These developments subtly signaled the beginning of the eclipse of Muslim primacy in the scientific world. The shift of the exploratory spirit was so stealthy, so insidiously slow, that the brightest minds missed the undercurrents until they surfaced starkly, and by then, the global stage had transformed. The West did not merely surpass others in the realms of discovery and conquest; it also ingeniously erased the contributions of generations of Muslims after the Prophet Muhammad from the historical narrative (Huff 2003). This strategic amnesia shifted the centers of knowledge and power and rewrote the legacy of a civilization that had once been the world’s intellectual powerhouse.

The exclusion from the Age of Discovery was not a minor footnote in Islamic history—it was a profound civilizational loss. What deepened this injury was the West’s audacious campaign against historical truth. By the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, a new myth had crystallized: the Age of Discovery was declared an exclusively Western triumph. Before Europe’s rise, the world was portrayed as languishing in a so-called “Dark Age,” awaiting salvation through the European Renaissance (Burke 2000). This narrative eclipsed the formative role of Muslim centers of learning in Andalusia and Sicily, whose scholars had laid the intellectual foundations of modern Europe.

This Western-centric account was amplified through colonial discourse and internalized by the Muslim world itself. Dazzled by Western technological achievements and narrative dominance, many Muslims began to doubt their own civilizational memory. The resolve to reclaim a forgotten legacy weakened, replaced by an acceptance of distorted history (Said 1978). The erasure of Islamic contributions thus succeeded not only externally but internally, undermining confidence and ambition within Muslim societies.

Civilization, however, is not an exclusive inheritance of East or West, nor of any single religious or cultural tradition. It is a cumulative human achievement. Whenever nations fabricate myths to veil historical truth, they do not merely distort the past—they rob humanity of insight essential for navigating the future. Such manipulation constitutes an epistemic crime, severing societies from the deep reservoirs of historical experience that could otherwise inform renewal and reform (Toynbee 1934).
History is not a parade of triumphs and vanities; it is the long road humanity treads in search of improvement. When that road is obscured by fabricated myths or darkened under the banner of an invented “Dark Age,” our collective understanding is crippled. Planning the future without clarity about the past condemns societies to repeat decline rather than transcend it.

A pressing question thus emerges: how did the West, after centuries of harvesting the intellectual fields of Islamic civilization, rise so decisively during and after the Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century that it came to command global authority, while the bearers of the Quran remained spectators on the same earth? Understanding this paradox requires examining how the West absorbed Muslim scientific rationalism while sidestepping the theological entanglements that later paralyzed Islamic discourse (Huff 2003). This inquiry is not merely academic. It holds the key to understanding how knowledge travels, mutates, and empowers—and how civilizations lose momentum when epistemology is severed from its original ethical and exploratory impulse.

Part III
Andalusia & Toledo: Europe’s First Dār al-Ḥikmah

At this juncture in history, Muslims held the compass of civilization. Both Eastern and Western thinkers recognized that the vibrant resurgence energizing the West traced its veins back to the East. The flourishing arts and sciences that Europe later celebrated were deeply indebted to Muslim scholars, whose intellectual enterprises first ignited a new scientific spirit in places such as Sicily and Andalusia (Huff 2003; Saliba 2007). Even until the eighteenth century, Avicenna’s The Canon of Medicine remained a cornerstone of European academic instruction (Siraisi 1990).

Against this backdrop, the Muslim presence in Andalusia represented not merely a political expansion but a profound intellectual challenge. The rapid establishment of governance—achieved within five years in Iberia—bewildered Christian observers accustomed to slower, fragmented political consolidation. This was a conquest of ideas as much as of territory. Within decades of Ṭāriq ibn Ziyād’s landing in 711 CE, Christian intellectuals responded not only militarily but scripturally, producing an Arabic translation of the Bible by 724 CE in an effort to meet Islam on intellectual ground (Menocal 2002).

As Muslim rule stabilized, Andalusia emerged as a beacon of scientific and cultural efflorescence. Under ʿAbd al-Raḥmān II, Cordoba became a magnet for scholars and manuscripts from across the Islamic world. Astronomy, medicine, mathematics, and philosophy flourished. Ibn Firnas established an observatory that synchronized celestial observation with religious life through sophisticated water clocks, integrating cosmology with daily ritual (Kennedy 1983). Drawing upon al-Khwārizmī’s Zīj al-Sindhind, astronomical tables were recalibrated for Andalusian skies, marking an early localization of scientific knowledge.
Under ʿAbd al-Raḥmān III and al-Ḥakam II, Andalusia reached its intellectual zenith. Cordoba’s libraries numbered in the dozens, with al-Ḥakam’s personal collection reportedly exceeding four hundred thousand volumes—a staggering contrast to the meager collections of contemporary European monasteries (Menocal 2002). Medical science advanced through figures such as Abū al-Qāsim al-Zahrāwī (Abulcasis), whose al-Taṣrīf synthesized decades of surgical practice and remained authoritative in Europe for centuries (Siraisi 1990). Abu al-Maslamah al-Majrīṭī refined astronomical tables for Cordoba’s longitude, a development that later enabled Adelard of Bath to emerge as England’s first true scientist (Burnett 2001).
The intellectual transmission intensified dramatically after the Christian conquest of Toledo in 1085. Rather than extinguishing Muslim learning, the city became Europe’s foremost translation center. Arabic texts—encompassing astronomy, medicine, mathematics, philosophy, and theology—were rendered into Latin through collaborative efforts involving Muslims, Jews, and Christians (Burnett 2001). Gerard of Cremona alone translated approximately eighty-eight works, including Ptolemy’s Almagest and Avicenna’s Canon of Medicine, embedding Islamic science at the core of European education (Saliba 2007).

Avicenna’s influence was unparalleled. His insistence on observation and empirical reasoning transformed medicine into a systematic science. Between 1500 and 1674, The Canon of Medicine was printed in over sixty editions in Europe, dominating medical curricula for nearly six centuries (Siraisi 1990). Alongside Avicenna, Averroes (Ibn Rushd) profoundly shaped Western philosophy. His commentaries on Aristotle, translated in Andalusia, informed Jewish thinkers such as Maimonides and Christian theologians including Thomas Aquinas, anchoring scholastic philosophy in Islamic rationalism (Leaman 1998).

Toledo thus functioned as Europe’s first true Dār al-Ḥikmah—a house of wisdom where the intellectual capital of the Islamic world was systematically absorbed, translated, and disseminated. Scholars from across Europe migrated there, disillusioned with the sterility of Paris or Oxford, seeking access to a civilization that had already reconciled faith with reason. This was not passive borrowing but an epistemic rebirth. The West’s emergence from the so-called Dark Ages was inseparable from this Andalusian and Toledan transmission, which transformed inherited ignorance into structured inquiry and laid the foundations of Europe’s scientific awakening.

Part IV
Sicily, Venice, and the Geometry of a New World

Sicily occupies a pivotal place in the transmission of Islamic knowledge to the West. Muslims first arrived on the island as early as 652 CE, but it was between the ninth and eleventh centuries that Sicily matured into a fully developed center of scientific and cultural life. Governed successively by the Aghlabids, the Fatimids, and an autonomous emirate until 1091, the island flourished as a hub of learning, commerce, and cosmopolitan exchange (Metcalfe 2009). When the Normans conquered Sicily in 1091, they inherited not a backward province but a sophisticated civilization marked by observatories, schools, libraries, and mosques that doubled as scientific institutions.

Muslim minarets in Sicily were not merely architectural symbols of faith; they functioned as platforms for precise astronomical observation. From these elevated sites, scholars calculated prayer times, determined the direction of the Kaʿba, and tracked the movements of celestial bodies. Religious life and scientific inquiry were seamlessly integrated, reflecting an epistemology in which faith did not inhibit reason but animated it (Saliba 2007). The Norman rulers, far from dismantling this system, preserved it. Recognizing the economic and intellectual advantages of Muslim science, they ensured the continued presence of Muslim scholars and facilitated the steady inflow of knowledge from other Islamic lands.

This intellectual continuity reached its zenith under King Roger II (r. 1130–1154), whose court became one of the most enlightened in medieval Europe. Roger’s patronage of the Muslim polymath al-Idrīsī resulted in one of the most significant cartographic achievements in human history: Nuzhat al-Mushtāq fī Ikhtirāq al-Āfāq, known in the West as The Book of Roger (Harley and Woodward 1987). Compiled over fifteen years using reports from travelers, merchants, and scholars across the known world, al-Idrīsī’s map presented the earth as a coherent, measurable whole. It replaced mythic geography with empirical observation and offered Europe its first reliable global vision.

Al-Idrīsī’s cartography shattered the medieval Christian conception of a flat, tripartite world confined to Europe, Asia, and Africa. His work enabled safer navigation, expanded geographical imagination, and laid the intellectual groundwork for later oceanic exploration. Vasco da Gama’s voyages and Columbus’s transatlantic expeditions were inconceivable without the navigational knowledge distilled from Muslim geography and astronomy (Needham 1971). In this period, to sail without Islamic scientific tools was not daring—it was reckless.

The Sicilian legacy did not end with Roger II. Under Frederick II (r. 1212–1250), often derided by the Church as the “Baptized Sultan,” Sicily became the crucible of Europe’s intellectual transformation. Frederick II openly admired Islamic culture, spoke Arabic fluently, surrounded himself with Muslim scholars, and governed in conscious defiance of ecclesiastical anti-intellectualism (Abulafia 1990). His court institutionalized learning by founding universities at Naples, Padua, and Messina, with the University of Naples (est. 1224) standing as the first university in Europe created by royal decree. These institutions became conduits through which Islamic science entered the bloodstream of Western education.
From Sicily, the flow of knowledge moved northward, reaching Venice—Europe’s most Eastern of Western cities. Venice’s architecture, urban planning, and commercial culture bore unmistakable Islamic imprints. Through sustained trade with Muslim lands, Venetians absorbed not only commodities but mathematical, geometric, and navigational knowledge (Jacoby 2006). The fall of Toledo had already delivered Euclid’s Elements and al-Khwārizmī’s algebra to Europe; Venice transformed this knowledge into architectural and maritime practice.

Geometry became the hidden engine of Western transformation. Translated Arabic mathematical texts revolutionized construction techniques, enabling arches, domes, and vaults previously unknown in Europe. What later came to be mislabeled “Gothic” architecture emerged from this mathematical awakening. The Abbey of Saint-Denis in 1127 marked a decisive break from classical Roman forms, inaugurating a style grounded in pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and geometric precision—features long mastered by Muslim architects (Bony 1983).

As geometry entered cathedral schools and universities, the Western worldview shifted fundamentally. The universe was no longer a symbolic mystery to be accepted on faith alone; it became a system governed by measurable laws. Mathematics provided a new language for philosophy, architecture, and science, transforming Europe’s intellectual horizon. This epistemic shift—rooted in Islamic science—prepared the ground for the Renaissance and, ultimately, modernity.

Thus, through Sicily and Venice, Islamic knowledge did not merely cross borders; it reshaped the very grammar of Western thought. Cartography reimagined the world, geometry restructured space, and navigation unlocked the oceans. The West did not awaken spontaneously. It was taught—patiently, rigorously, and decisively—by a civilization that had already reconciled revelation with reason.

Part V
Gothic Architecture, Historical Amnesia, and the Theft of Memory

As geometry and mathematics penetrated the intellectual bloodstream of Europe, architecture emerged as their most visible expression. The towering cathedrals of medieval Europe—celebrated as symbols of Christian genius—were not the spontaneous products of Western imagination. They were the architectural offspring of Islamic geometry transmitted through Arabic–Latin translations during the twelfth century (Bony 1983; Saliba 2007). Without Euclid’s Elements and the mathematical sciences conveyed through Muslim intermediaries, the vaulted ceilings, pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and flying buttresses of European cathedrals would have been structurally inconceivable.

Before this mathematical infusion, Western architecture remained trapped in the limitations of semicircular arches and massive load-bearing walls, leaving little room for windows, light, or aesthetic refinement. Geometry liberated space. It enabled height, lightness, proportion, and daring spans. Beginning with the Abbey of Saint-Denis in 1127, Europe embarked on an architectural revolution that within a century produced nearly eighty major cathedrals in France alone (Bony 1983). This style, later misnamed “Gothic,” bore no genealogical relation to the barbarian Goths. It was, in essence, Islamic architecture translated into stone within a Christian context.

Christopher Wren, the architect of St. Paul’s Cathedral and one of the most influential figures in British architectural history, recognized this truth with rare candor. He argued that what Europeans called “Gothic” should more accurately be termed “Saracenic,” acknowledging that the pointed arch, geometric vaulting, and modular construction were inherited from Muslim builders whose sciences Europe had once lost and later reborrowed through Arabic books (Wren 1710/1965). Subsequent scholars such as William Anderson and Jean Bony corroborated this assessment, demonstrating that Gothic architecture was structurally indebted to Islamic precedents rather than European barbarism.

Yet Western historiography systematically erased this lineage. What was borrowed was rebranded; what was inherited was renamed; what was learned was claimed as native genius. This erasure extended beyond architecture into science, medicine, philosophy, and cartography. The Renaissance was recast as a purely European miracle, while the centuries of Islamic intellectual labor that nourished it were relegated to obscurity or dismissed as mere custodianship of Greek knowledge (Said 1978; Huff 2003).

This historical amnesia was not accidental. By the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Europe required a civilizational myth to justify colonial dominance. The narrative of a self-generated Renaissance following a self-endured Dark Age served that purpose. Islamic civilization was written out of history to present Western ascendancy as inevitable, endogenous, and morally deserved. In the process, Muslim societies themselves internalized this distorted narrative, gradually losing confidence in their own epistemic heritage.

The consequences were profound. Once stripped of their intellectual memory, Muslims came to view modern science as alien rather than ancestral, Western rather than universal. The Qur’anic epistemology that had once harmonized revelation with observation, faith with inquiry, and ethics with exploration was severed from its historical manifestations. What remained was a theology increasingly detached from the sciences that had once given it civilizational force.

Civilization, however, is not the private property of any culture. It is a cumulative human trust. To deny the Islamic foundations of modern Western civilization is not merely an academic error; it is an ethical violation against historical truth. When societies fabricate origins and suppress inheritances, they impoverish humanity’s collective memory and compromise its future.

History is humanity’s long conversation with itself. To falsify that conversation is to plan the future in darkness. The recovery of Islamic intellectual history is therefore not an exercise in nostalgia, nor a plea for recognition. It is a necessary act of epistemic justice. Only by restoring continuity between Qur’anic reason and its historical achievements can Muslims reclaim their role as contributors to, rather than spectators of, global civilization.

The question, then, is no longer how the West rose—but how the heirs of Qur’anic reason can rise again, not by imitation, but by remembering what they once taught the world.

Bibliography

Abulafia, David. 1990. Frederick II: A Medieval Emperor. London: Allen Lane.
Bennett, J. A. 1987. The Divided Circle: A History of Instruments for Astronomy, Navigation and Surveying. Oxford: Phaidon.
Bony, Jean. 1983. French Gothic Architecture of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, Peter. 2000. A Social History of Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Burnett, Charles. 2001. “The Coherence of the Arabic–Latin Translation Program in Toledo.” Science in Context 14 (1–2): 249–288.
Gutas, Dimitri. 1998. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture. London: Routledge.
Harley, J. B., and David Woodward. 1987. The History of Cartography, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huff, Toby. 2003. The Rise of Early Modern Science: Islam, China, and the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacoby, David. 2006. Commercial Exchange across the Mediterranean. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kennedy, Edward S. 1983. Studies in the Islamic Exact Sciences. Beirut: American University of Beirut.
Leaman, Oliver. 1998. Averroes and His Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MacLean, Gerald. 2004. Looking East: English Writing and the Ottoman Empire. London: Palgrave.
Matar, Nabil. 1999. Turks, Moors and Englishmen in the Age of Discovery. New York: Columbia University Press.
Menocal, María Rosa. 2002. The Ornament of the World. Boston: Little, Brown.
Needham, Joseph. 1971. Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ragep, F. Jamil. 1993. Nasir al-Din al-Tusi’s Memoir on Astronomy. New York: Springer.
Runciman, Steven. 1965. The Fall of Constantinople 1453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
Saliba, George. 2007. Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Siraisi, Nancy G. 1990. Avicenna in Renaissance Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. 1997. The Career and Legend of Vasco da Gama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toynbee, Arnold J. 1934. A Study of History. London: Oxford University Press.
Wren, Christopher. (1710) 1965. Parentalia. London: Gregg Press.